<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parliamentary Question on Data Retention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalrights.ie/2005/10/25/parliamentary-question-on-data-retention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2005/10/25/parliamentary-question-on-data-retention/</link>
	<description>Civil, Legal and Human Rights in a Digital Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:16:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: waterville ireland</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2005/10/25/parliamentary-question-on-data-retention/comment-page-1/#comment-127946</link>
		<dc:creator>waterville ireland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrightsireland.org/?p=9#comment-127946</guid>
		<description>I recently encountered this on a blog which had automatically closed comments after a timeperiod. However a somewhat defamatory comment had been made and was subsequently discovered. While the organisation being defamed did not feel the need to take action in this case, it was interesting that the website (based in the states) didn&#039;t take a blind bit of notice when complaint was made, they left the comments closed and ignored requests to remove the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently encountered this on a blog which had automatically closed comments after a timeperiod. However a somewhat defamatory comment had been made and was subsequently discovered. While the organisation being defamed did not feel the need to take action in this case, it was interesting that the website (based in the states) didn&#8217;t take a blind bit of notice when complaint was made, they left the comments closed and ignored requests to remove the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Traffic Data Retention, Irish-style, returns to the legislative agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2005/10/25/parliamentary-question-on-data-retention/comment-page-1/#comment-108040</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Traffic Data Retention, Irish-style, returns to the legislative agenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrightsireland.org/?p=9#comment-108040</guid>
		<description>[...] The Communications (Retention of Data) Bill 2009, published last week, has caused a bit of a stir in this morning&#8217;s newspapers. It will give effect to EU Data Retention Directive 2006/24/EC of 15 March 2006 (blogged here) which recently survived challenge by the Irish Government in the European Court of Justice, and it will replace the radically misconceived and deeply flawed stop-gap Part 7 of the Criminal Justice (Terrorist Offences) Act, 2005 (also here) (blogged here). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Communications (Retention of Data) Bill 2009, published last week, has caused a bit of a stir in this morning&#8217;s newspapers. It will give effect to EU Data Retention Directive 2006/24/EC of 15 March 2006 (blogged here) which recently survived challenge by the Irish Government in the European Court of Justice, and it will replace the radically misconceived and deeply flawed stop-gap Part 7 of the Criminal Justice (Terrorist Offences) Act, 2005 (also here) (blogged here). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Community At Large &#187; Digital Rights Ireland and you</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2005/10/25/parliamentary-question-on-data-retention/comment-page-1/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>The Community At Large &#187; Digital Rights Ireland and you</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrightsireland.org/?p=9#comment-247</guid>
		<description>[...] They’ve also started to try to use the mechanisms of rights enforcement- a complaint has been lodged with the EU Commission that Ireland’s failure to protect webmail from intrusion is a breach of EU law. Parliamentary questions have been asked of the Minister for Justice in relation to the mass surveillance fostered by his data retention laws. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] They’ve also started to try to use the mechanisms of rights enforcement- a complaint has been lodged with the EU Commission that Ireland’s failure to protect webmail from intrusion is a breach of EU law. Parliamentary questions have been asked of the Minister for Justice in relation to the mass surveillance fostered by his data retention laws. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Rights Ireland &#187; DRI is looking for your support</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2005/10/25/parliamentary-question-on-data-retention/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Rights Ireland &#187; DRI is looking for your support</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrightsireland.org/?p=9#comment-83</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;ve focused attention on data retention, by lobbying, use of parliamentary questions and encouraging media scrutiny of the European Parliament&#8217;s vote to bring in a Data Retention Directive. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We&#8217;ve focused attention on data retention, by lobbying, use of parliamentary questions and encouraging media scrutiny of the European Parliament&#8217;s vote to bring in a Data Retention Directive. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuppenceworth.ie blog &#187; Watching the Watchers</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2005/10/25/parliamentary-question-on-data-retention/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuppenceworth.ie blog &#187; Watching the Watchers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2005 12:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrightsireland.org/?p=9#comment-21</guid>
		<description>[...] It gives a rundown of the attempt, led by ourselves and the UK, to bring in this kind of surveillence system across the EU. Of course, we already have one here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It gives a rundown of the attempt, led by ourselves and the UK, to bring in this kind of surveillence system across the EU. Of course, we already have one here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

