<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Irish Government challenges Data Retention Directive &#8211; but ignores privacy rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/07/irish-government-challenges-data-retention-directive-but-ignores-privacy-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/07/irish-government-challenges-data-retention-directive-but-ignores-privacy-rights/</link>
	<description>Civil, Legal and Human Rights in a Digital Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:08:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Digital Rights Ireland &#187; Data Retention - Advocate General will give opinion on Irish Challenge in two weeks</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/07/irish-government-challenges-data-retention-directive-but-ignores-privacy-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-87849</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Rights Ireland &#187; Data Retention - Advocate General will give opinion on Irish Challenge in two weeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 08:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/07/irish-government-challenges-data-retention-directive-but-ignores-privacy-rights/#comment-87849</guid>
		<description>[...] of Justice has just listed Tuesday, October 14 for the Advocate General&#8217;s opinion on the State&#8217;s challenge to the Data Retention Directive. This won&#8217;t be a final decision - the Advocate General gives an opinion which is merely [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Justice has just listed Tuesday, October 14 for the Advocate General&#8217;s opinion on the State&#8217;s challenge to the Data Retention Directive. This won&#8217;t be a final decision &#8211; the Advocate General gives an opinion which is merely [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuppenceworth.ie blog &#187; Irish Government Lodges Objection to Data Retention Directive with ECJ</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/07/irish-government-challenges-data-retention-directive-but-ignores-privacy-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-2410</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuppenceworth.ie blog &#187; Irish Government Lodges Objection to Data Retention Directive with ECJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 11:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/07/irish-government-challenges-data-retention-directive-but-ignores-privacy-rights/#comment-2410</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE: More from Digital Rights Ireland on this. They discuss the basis for the Irish Government&#8217;s challenge. From what they say, it seems it will be a technical, porcedural challenge taken to protect the Irish Veto in decision making in the Council of Ministers, rather than a challenge on the substantive issue of the Directive&#8217;s breach of the right to privacy.  data retention&#187; Digital Rights Ireland&#187; EU law&#187; Law&#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE: More from Digital Rights Ireland on this. They discuss the basis for the Irish Government&#8217;s challenge. From what they say, it seems it will be a technical, porcedural challenge taken to protect the Irish Veto in decision making in the Council of Ministers, rather than a challenge on the substantive issue of the Directive&#8217;s breach of the right to privacy.  data retention&raquo; Digital Rights Ireland&raquo; EU law&raquo; Law&raquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
