<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DRI challenge to Data Retention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/29/dri-challenge-to-data-retention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/29/dri-challenge-to-data-retention/</link>
	<description>Civil, Legal and Human Rights in a Digital Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:08:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Strijd bewaarplicht met grondrechten eindelijk getoetst door Europese rechter &#8211; Bits of Freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/29/dri-challenge-to-data-retention/comment-page-1/#comment-128354</link>
		<dc:creator>Strijd bewaarplicht met grondrechten eindelijk getoetst door Europese rechter &#8211; Bits of Freedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 11:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/29/dri-challenge-to-data-retention/#comment-128354</guid>
		<description>[...] Digital Rights Ireland, de Ierse collega van Bits of Freedom, boekt met de doorverwijzing een belangrijk succes. In Duitsland, Roemenië en Bulgarije is de bewaarplicht al ongrondwettig verklaard. In tegenstelling tot deze landen, kent Nederland  geen Consitutioneel Hof. Daarom is de toetsing van wetten aan de fundamentele rechten bij ons moeilijk te realiseren. Maar als het Europese Hof van Justitie in Luxemburg de richtlijn strijdig met onze grondrechten verklaart worden alle Europeanen in een klap verlost van de richtlijn bewaarplicht. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digital Rights Ireland, de Ierse collega van Bits of Freedom, boekt met de doorverwijzing een belangrijk succes. In Duitsland, Roemenië en Bulgarije is de bewaarplicht al ongrondwettig verklaard. In tegenstelling tot deze landen, kent Nederland  geen Consitutioneel Hof. Daarom is de toetsing van wetten aan de fundamentele rechten bij ons moeilijk te realiseren. Maar als het Europese Hof van Justitie in Luxemburg de richtlijn strijdig met onze grondrechten verklaart worden alle Europeanen in een klap verlost van de richtlijn bewaarplicht. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Rights Ireland &#187; High Court decision on our data retention challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/29/dri-challenge-to-data-retention/comment-page-1/#comment-128321</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Rights Ireland &#187; High Court decision on our data retention challenge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 23:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/29/dri-challenge-to-data-retention/#comment-128321</guid>
		<description>[...] today from the High Court where Mr. Justice McKechnie gave an extremely favourable decision on our constitutional challenge to data retention [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] today from the High Court where Mr. Justice McKechnie gave an extremely favourable decision on our constitutional challenge to data retention [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kidderminster Solicitors</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/29/dri-challenge-to-data-retention/comment-page-1/#comment-113530</link>
		<dc:creator>Kidderminster Solicitors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/29/dri-challenge-to-data-retention/#comment-113530</guid>
		<description>I have tried to find this case on the DRI’s solicitor’s website but have failed.  It is possibly moved or no longer exists?

I am sorry to trouble you but could you let us know the URL link please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried to find this case on the DRI’s solicitor’s website but have failed.  It is possibly moved or no longer exists?</p>
<p>I am sorry to trouble you but could you let us know the URL link please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fishy</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/29/dri-challenge-to-data-retention/comment-page-1/#comment-15722</link>
		<dc:creator>Fishy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/29/dri-challenge-to-data-retention/#comment-15722</guid>
		<description>You can follow the progress of this case on DRI&#039;s solicitor&#039;s website, McGarr Solicitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can follow the progress of this case on DRI&#8217;s solicitor&#8217;s website, McGarr Solicitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/29/dri-challenge-to-data-retention/comment-page-1/#comment-15721</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/29/dri-challenge-to-data-retention/#comment-15721</guid>
		<description>was this case taken to the eu and if so how do i read the outcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>was this case taken to the eu and if so how do i read the outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Oboro</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/29/dri-challenge-to-data-retention/comment-page-1/#comment-5874</link>
		<dc:creator>John Oboro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 20:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/29/dri-challenge-to-data-retention/#comment-5874</guid>
		<description>It is so appalling that at this very crucial period of human history,one still find Government that is adamant to the yearning of the people.Government action no doubt will infringe on the very right of the customers who in all estate are entitled to certain right and priveiledges.And if allowed it will undermined the individual rights and should Government to ahead,there must be in place a legislation to safeguard the customers&#039; rights/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is so appalling that at this very crucial period of human history,one still find Government that is adamant to the yearning of the people.Government action no doubt will infringe on the very right of the customers who in all estate are entitled to certain right and priveiledges.And if allowed it will undermined the individual rights and should Government to ahead,there must be in place a legislation to safeguard the customers&#8217; rights/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Rights Ireland &#187; DRI brings legal action over mass surveillance</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/29/dri-challenge-to-data-retention/comment-page-1/#comment-5790</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Rights Ireland &#187; DRI brings legal action over mass surveillance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/29/dri-challenge-to-data-retention/#comment-5790</guid>
		<description>[...] Irish civil rights group Digital Rights Ireland (DRI) has started a High Court action against the Irish Government challenging new European and Irish laws requiring mass surveillance. DRI Chairman TJ McIntyre said: These laws require telephone companies and internet service providers to spy on all customers, logging their movements, their telephone calls, their emails, and their internet access, and to store that information for up to three years. This information can then be accessed without any court order or other adequate safeguard. We believe that this is a breach of fundamental rights. We have written to the Government raising our concerns but, as they have failed to take any action, we are now forced to start legal proceedings. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Irish civil rights group Digital Rights Ireland (DRI) has started a High Court action against the Irish Government challenging new European and Irish laws requiring mass surveillance. DRI Chairman TJ McIntyre said: These laws require telephone companies and internet service providers to spy on all customers, logging their movements, their telephone calls, their emails, and their internet access, and to store that information for up to three years. This information can then be accessed without any court order or other adequate safeguard. We believe that this is a breach of fundamental rights. We have written to the Government raising our concerns but, as they have failed to take any action, we are now forced to start legal proceedings. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Midnight Court &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digital Rights and Digital Wrongs</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/29/dri-challenge-to-data-retention/comment-page-1/#comment-4829</link>
		<dc:creator>The Midnight Court &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digital Rights and Digital Wrongs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 04:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/29/dri-challenge-to-data-retention/#comment-4829</guid>
		<description>[...] It is close to a month since DRI wrote to the Ministers for Justice, Equality and Law Reform and Communications, Marine and Natural Resources to seek undertakings that the gentlemen in question would “cease breaching the Constitutional, statutory and European rights of the citizens of Ireland”.  As recently pointed out on Tuppenceworth.ie, when the Government was asked by Brussels whether the Garda had encountered circumstances during the investigations of criminal activity which justified recourse to such a draconian assault on civil rights, the answer which came back was a rather sheepish, er, “No”. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It is close to a month since DRI wrote to the Ministers for Justice, Equality and Law Reform and Communications, Marine and Natural Resources to seek undertakings that the gentlemen in question would “cease breaching the Constitutional, statutory and European rights of the citizens of Ireland”.  As recently pointed out on Tuppenceworth.ie, when the Government was asked by Brussels whether the Garda had encountered circumstances during the investigations of criminal activity which justified recourse to such a draconian assault on civil rights, the answer which came back was a rather sheepish, er, “No”. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Verbo.se &#187; I know where you&#8217;ve been!</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/29/dri-challenge-to-data-retention/comment-page-1/#comment-4819</link>
		<dc:creator>Verbo.se &#187; I know where you&#8217;ve been!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 02:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/29/dri-challenge-to-data-retention/#comment-4819</guid>
		<description>[...] But don&#8217;t forget the environment we&#8217;re living in these days, where Gov.us is taking whole US states to court to stop them forcing telcos to admit that they spied on American citizens,  Gov.uk can throw you in jail if you forget your crypto key, and of course Gov.ie sez All Yore Data Are Belong To Them (sorry) and really, eVoting is cool and you can trust them with it. Don&#8217;t even get me started on the religious right, currently trying to stop hotels in the US from allowing their customers to view porn, and who I have no doubt will start resurfacing in a big way in Ireland Real Soon Now. So given the way we&#8217;re going, it&#8217;s not hard to imagine one of these right-wing nutjob governments &#8220;recommending&#8221; that sites install a listener for them, monitoring at the outset for visits to known dodgy sites, say terrorist and paedophile hangouts. Then comes the black box, and we don&#8217;t know what they&#8217;re storing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But don&#8217;t forget the environment we&#8217;re living in these days, where Gov.us is taking whole US states to court to stop them forcing telcos to admit that they spied on American citizens,  Gov.uk can throw you in jail if you forget your crypto key, and of course Gov.ie sez All Yore Data Are Belong To Them (sorry) and really, eVoting is cool and you can trust them with it. Don&#8217;t even get me started on the religious right, currently trying to stop hotels in the US from allowing their customers to view porn, and who I have no doubt will start resurfacing in a big way in Ireland Real Soon Now. So given the way we&#8217;re going, it&#8217;s not hard to imagine one of these right-wing nutjob governments &#8220;recommending&#8221; that sites install a listener for them, monitoring at the outset for visits to known dodgy sites, say terrorist and paedophile hangouts. Then comes the black box, and we don&#8217;t know what they&#8217;re storing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Rights Ireland challenges the government &#187; at Tom Raftery&#8217;s I.T. views</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/29/dri-challenge-to-data-retention/comment-page-1/#comment-3272</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Rights Ireland challenges the government &#187; at Tom Raftery&#8217;s I.T. views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/07/29/dri-challenge-to-data-retention/#comment-3272</guid>
		<description>[...] Via Bernard and Damien comes news that Digital Rights Ireland is going to challenge the constitutionality of an Irish law which mandates telcos operating in Ireland to retain the details of all electronic traffic for 3 years. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via Bernard and Damien comes news that Digital Rights Ireland is going to challenge the constitutionality of an Irish law which mandates telcos operating in Ireland to retain the details of all electronic traffic for 3 years. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
