<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liberty v. UK: European Court of Human Rights finds mass surveillance system violates the right to privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalrights.ie/2008/07/01/liberty-v-uk-european-court-of-human-rights-finds-mass-surveillance-system-violates-the-right-to-privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2008/07/01/liberty-v-uk-european-court-of-human-rights-finds-mass-surveillance-system-violates-the-right-to-privacy/</link>
	<description>Civil, Legal and Human Rights in a Digital Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:16:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charles Douglas Wehner</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2008/07/01/liberty-v-uk-european-court-of-human-rights-finds-mass-surveillance-system-violates-the-right-to-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-114973</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Douglas Wehner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrights.ie/?p=113#comment-114973</guid>
		<description>Britain is CONSTANTLY violating Human Rights.

There was, of course, the well-know case of torture in Northern Ireland, brought by the Republic. The Republic won, of course.

There is a gang, condemned by eight Popes of Rome, to whom the secret government of Britain belongs:
http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Clem12/c15inemengl.htm 

They are a society with secrets. One secret is that they torture each other, to force each other into terrorism. 
http://www.niagarafallsreporter.com/hanchette143.html 

The death of William James at the hands of Albert Eid, of the American splinter-group mirrors the case of what the British gangsters were doing to innocent Irish.

Here is another:
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/may2001/ire-m11.shtml 

And another:
http://www.ukmm.org.uk/camp/hr/scarth.htm 

In paragraph 17 of that last example, &quot;Lord Justice Morritt&quot; lies under oath, and pretends that he can dismiss WHOLESALE the European Convention on Human Rights just to avoid a conviction under Article 6. He LOST.

In reality, according to many - including LEEDS UNIVERSITY - britain helped formulate That Convention and signed in 1951. It only came into force in 1953, so Britain was bound by Human Rights from the outset.

However, the reason for signing is REVERSED MORALS. It is a &quot;virtue&quot; to deceive. So they sign the Convention, and by REVERSED LOGIC, violate EVERY article.

Charles Douglas Wehner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Britain is CONSTANTLY violating Human Rights.</p>
<p>There was, of course, the well-know case of torture in Northern Ireland, brought by the Republic. The Republic won, of course.</p>
<p>There is a gang, condemned by eight Popes of Rome, to whom the secret government of Britain belongs:<br />
<a href="http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Clem12/c15inemengl.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Clem12/c15inemengl.htm</a> </p>
<p>They are a society with secrets. One secret is that they torture each other, to force each other into terrorism.<br />
<a href="http://www.niagarafallsreporter.com/hanchette143.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.niagarafallsreporter.com/hanchette143.html</a> </p>
<p>The death of William James at the hands of Albert Eid, of the American splinter-group mirrors the case of what the British gangsters were doing to innocent Irish.</p>
<p>Here is another:<br />
<a href="http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/may2001/ire-m11.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/may2001/ire-m11.shtml</a> </p>
<p>And another:<br />
<a href="http://www.ukmm.org.uk/camp/hr/scarth.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ukmm.org.uk/camp/hr/scarth.htm</a> </p>
<p>In paragraph 17 of that last example, &#8220;Lord Justice Morritt&#8221; lies under oath, and pretends that he can dismiss WHOLESALE the European Convention on Human Rights just to avoid a conviction under Article 6. He LOST.</p>
<p>In reality, according to many &#8211; including LEEDS UNIVERSITY &#8211; britain helped formulate That Convention and signed in 1951. It only came into force in 1953, so Britain was bound by Human Rights from the outset.</p>
<p>However, the reason for signing is REVERSED MORALS. It is a &#8220;virtue&#8221; to deceive. So they sign the Convention, and by REVERSED LOGIC, violate EVERY article.</p>
<p>Charles Douglas Wehner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UK Voter</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2008/07/01/liberty-v-uk-european-court-of-human-rights-finds-mass-surveillance-system-violates-the-right-to-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-89831</link>
		<dc:creator>UK Voter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrights.ie/?p=113#comment-89831</guid>
		<description>The news that the government now wants to track our mobile phone calls, texts, emails and internet browsing habits has got me enraged. For the past 11 years, this government has sought more and more control over its citizens, from installing 4.2m CCTV cameras, to the suggestion that we must respond to more and more intrusive questions when they complete the next census. It has simply got to stop.

On this occasion, I have done something about it, in my own small way. I have written an article outlining what the government is seeking to do and my views. But, I have also produced a ‘draft’ letter that can be personalised and sent to local MP’s. I am urging other likeminded people to reproduce the article, to include their own comments, after all, not everyone will agree with all my comments and then publicise it. Maybe we can start a programme where people start to bombard their MP’s with a demand that they do not support the latest data communication bill. The link is here if you would care to take a look.
http://www.power-to-the-people.co.uk/2008/10/public-call-time-big-brother-britain/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The news that the government now wants to track our mobile phone calls, texts, emails and internet browsing habits has got me enraged. For the past 11 years, this government has sought more and more control over its citizens, from installing 4.2m CCTV cameras, to the suggestion that we must respond to more and more intrusive questions when they complete the next census. It has simply got to stop.</p>
<p>On this occasion, I have done something about it, in my own small way. I have written an article outlining what the government is seeking to do and my views. But, I have also produced a ‘draft’ letter that can be personalised and sent to local MP’s. I am urging other likeminded people to reproduce the article, to include their own comments, after all, not everyone will agree with all my comments and then publicise it. Maybe we can start a programme where people start to bombard their MP’s with a demand that they do not support the latest data communication bill. The link is here if you would care to take a look.<br />
<a href="http://www.power-to-the-people.co.uk/2008/10/public-call-time-big-brother-britain/" rel="nofollow">http://www.power-to-the-people.co.uk/2008/10/public-call-time-big-brother-britain/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 58 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Liberty v. UK: European Court of Human Rights finds mass&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2008/07/01/liberty-v-uk-european-court-of-human-rights-finds-mass-surveillance-system-violates-the-right-to-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-78508</link>
		<dc:creator>58 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Liberty v. UK: European Court of Human Rights finds mass&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrights.ie/?p=113#comment-78508</guid>
		<description>[...] Liberty v. UK: European Court of Human Rights finds mass&#8230; In the appropriately named Liberty v. The United Kingdom the European Court of Human Rights has held that a system of mass surveillance operated by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Liberty v. UK: European Court of Human Rights finds mass&#8230; In the appropriately named Liberty v. The United Kingdom the European Court of Human Rights has held that a system of mass surveillance operated by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Comment on Liberty v. UK: European Court of Human Rights finds mass&#8230; A System Of A Down: What The World Is Saying About A System Of A Down</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2008/07/01/liberty-v-uk-european-court-of-human-rights-finds-mass-surveillance-system-violates-the-right-to-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-77816</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Comment on Liberty v. UK: European Court of Human Rights finds mass&#8230; A System Of A Down: What The World Is Saying About A System Of A Down</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 16:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrights.ie/?p=113#comment-77816</guid>
		<description>[...] Court of Human Rights finds mass&#8230;      Posted in July 7th, 2008  by  in Uncategorized Comment on Liberty v. UK: European Court of Human Rights finds mass&#8230; 7. By a letter dated 16 December 1999 the ICT confirmed that it had … of claims, by the time of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Court of Human Rights finds mass&#8230;      Posted in July 7th, 2008  by  in Uncategorized Comment on Liberty v. UK: European Court of Human Rights finds mass&#8230; 7. By a letter dated 16 December 1999 the ICT confirmed that it had … of claims, by the time of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 16 Down &#187; Liberty v. UK: European Court of Human Rights finds mass</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2008/07/01/liberty-v-uk-european-court-of-human-rights-finds-mass-surveillance-system-violates-the-right-to-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-77701</link>
		<dc:creator>16 Down &#187; Liberty v. UK: European Court of Human Rights finds mass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrights.ie/?p=113#comment-77701</guid>
		<description>[...] Liberty v. UK: European Court of Human Rights finds mass 7. By a letter dated 16 December 1999 the ICT confirmed that it had &#8230; of claims, by the time of the ruling these had been narrowed down to a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Liberty v. UK: European Court of Human Rights finds mass 7. By a letter dated 16 December 1999 the ICT confirmed that it had &#8230; of claims, by the time of the ruling these had been narrowed down to a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sw</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2008/07/01/liberty-v-uk-european-court-of-human-rights-finds-mass-surveillance-system-violates-the-right-to-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-76982</link>
		<dc:creator>sw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrights.ie/?p=113#comment-76982</guid>
		<description>do we all get compo ,anybody jailed ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do we all get compo ,anybody jailed ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ALEX TO &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Liberty v. UK: European Court of Human Rights finds mass&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2008/07/01/liberty-v-uk-european-court-of-human-rights-finds-mass-surveillance-system-violates-the-right-to-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-76873</link>
		<dc:creator>ALEX TO &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Liberty v. UK: European Court of Human Rights finds mass&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 22:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrights.ie/?p=113#comment-76873</guid>
		<description>[...] Liberty v. UK: European Court of Human Rights finds mass&#8230; Alex Gask, Liberty’s Legal Officer added: “The Court of Human Rights has rightly found that greater accessibility and accountability is&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Liberty v. UK: European Court of Human Rights finds mass&#8230; Alex Gask, Liberty’s Legal Officer added: “The Court of Human Rights has rightly found that greater accessibility and accountability is&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

