European Court upholds data retention… for the time being

The European Court of Justice has given its decision today in the Irish Government challenge to the Data Retention Directive - Ireland v. Parliament and Council (Press Release | Judgment). Unsurprisingly (in light of the Advocate General’s Opinion) it has held that the directive was properly adopted as an internal market measure (by qualified majority voting) rather than as a criminal matter (requiring unanimity). Where does this leave us and our case?

While it’s a pity to see the Directive upheld, the Government’s challenge was a very narrow one, dealing only with the essentially technical matter of the legal basis for the Directive. The Government didn’t raise and the ECJ wasn’t asked to decide on the fundamental rights issues. Indeed it expressly stated:

The Court notes at the outset that the action brought by Ireland relates solely to the choice of legal basis and not to any possible infringement by the directive of fundamental rights resulting from interference with the exercise of the right to privacy.

Consequently, the decision doesn’t affect the core of our challenge to the Directive, which will still go ahead on the basis that it infringes the rights to privacy and freedom of expression. At the moment we’re waiting on a decision from the High Court on our application to refer these issues to the ECJ – we’re confident that when these issues reach the ECJ that they will decide in our favour.

2 thoughts on “European Court upholds data retention… for the time being

  1. Pingback: cearta.ie ยป Data retention ironies

  2. B. Davidson

    The true irony of this whole privacy nightmare is that the laws being implemented by member states at present are anything BUT harmonised. Duration of retention, defined items to retain and mechanisms for retrieval are all over the place. Worse still, within the same nation differing understandings (and lack thereof) by individual providers (and law makers) is creating an even further lack of harmony. Saying that this is directive is correctly legally founded under economic harmonisation is laughable – the costs to providers, especially multinational ones, is phenomenal. It’s not like it’s a “service” providers can charge customers for, either. Keep up the fight, please, this directive is a massive failure with respect to implementation and it’s still early days!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>