<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Data Retention &#8211; Should it be left to a private agreement between the State and Telcos?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalrights.ie/2009/09/25/data-retention-should-it-be-left-to-a-private-agreement-between-the-state-and-telcos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2009/09/25/data-retention-should-it-be-left-to-a-private-agreement-between-the-state-and-telcos/</link>
	<description>Civil, Legal and Human Rights in a Digital Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:16:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Digital Rights Ireland &#187; Data retention agreement between Department of Justice and telcos leaked</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2009/09/25/data-retention-should-it-be-left-to-a-private-agreement-between-the-state-and-telcos/comment-page-1/#comment-131152</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Rights Ireland &#187; Data retention agreement between Department of Justice and telcos leaked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrights.ie/?p=223#comment-131152</guid>
		<description>[...] is available here. Again, it is important to ask why this document is being drawn up in secret. As Karlin Lillington wrote when the first version of this document was leaked: A secret memorandum of understanding between [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is available here. Again, it is important to ask why this document is being drawn up in secret. As Karlin Lillington wrote when the first version of this document was leaked: A secret memorandum of understanding between [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Kirby</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2009/09/25/data-retention-should-it-be-left-to-a-private-agreement-between-the-state-and-telcos/comment-page-1/#comment-127090</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Kirby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrights.ie/?p=223#comment-127090</guid>
		<description>The interplay between the Data Protection Acts and the FOI Acts is very relevant.

The Data Protection Commissioner uses a very broad concept of “personal data”.

The Information Commissioner uses a very narrow concept of “personal information”.

As the FOI Acts override the Data Protection Acts, “personal data” which is protected by the Data Protection Acts can be released using the Information Commissioner’s very narrow concept of “personal information”.

The Oireachtas could not have intended to give protection to a broad concept of “personal data” only to have that protection removed by the Information Commissioner’s narrow interpretation of “personal information”.

Furthermore the Data Protection Acts apply to public bodies AND non-public bodies. The FOI Acts apply only to public bodies. 

So, while “personal data” in non-public bodies is fully protected, “personal data” in public bodies is not fully protected because of the Information Commissioner’s very narrow concept of “personal information”. The Oireachtas could not have intended that scenario.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interplay between the Data Protection Acts and the FOI Acts is very relevant.</p>
<p>The Data Protection Commissioner uses a very broad concept of “personal data”.</p>
<p>The Information Commissioner uses a very narrow concept of “personal information”.</p>
<p>As the FOI Acts override the Data Protection Acts, “personal data” which is protected by the Data Protection Acts can be released using the Information Commissioner’s very narrow concept of “personal information”.</p>
<p>The Oireachtas could not have intended to give protection to a broad concept of “personal data” only to have that protection removed by the Information Commissioner’s narrow interpretation of “personal information”.</p>
<p>Furthermore the Data Protection Acts apply to public bodies AND non-public bodies. The FOI Acts apply only to public bodies. </p>
<p>So, while “personal data” in non-public bodies is fully protected, “personal data” in public bodies is not fully protected because of the Information Commissioner’s very narrow concept of “personal information”. The Oireachtas could not have intended that scenario.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

