<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Garda who abused phone records to spy on ex will not be prosecuted, will keep job</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalrights.ie/2011/09/02/garda-who-abused-phone-records-to-spy-on-ex-will-not-be-prosecuted-will-keep-job/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2011/09/02/garda-who-abused-phone-records-to-spy-on-ex-will-not-be-prosecuted-will-keep-job/</link>
	<description>Civil, Legal and Human Rights in a Digital Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 13:05:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Digital Rights Ireland &#187; Data retention threatens journalists also</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2011/09/02/garda-who-abused-phone-records-to-spy-on-ex-will-not-be-prosecuted-will-keep-job/comment-page-1/#comment-194030</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Rights Ireland &#187; Data retention threatens journalists also</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 22:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrights.ie/?p=343#comment-194030</guid>
		<description>[...] These revelations are shocking but not surprising &#8211; it&#8217;s long been known that data retention laws pose a special threat to whistleblowers and journalists, particularly in Ireland where there are no adequate sanctions for police abuse of surveillance powers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] These revelations are shocking but not surprising &#8211; it&#8217;s long been known that data retention laws pose a special threat to whistleblowers and journalists, particularly in Ireland where there are no adequate sanctions for police abuse of surveillance powers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2011/09/02/garda-who-abused-phone-records-to-spy-on-ex-will-not-be-prosecuted-will-keep-job/comment-page-1/#comment-190053</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 00:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrights.ie/?p=343#comment-190053</guid>
		<description>I must say that this particular case is disturbing, and I think it raises serious issues in how access to sensitive information is handled.

As you rightly point out, why did a Chief Superintendent sign this off? It means either of two things:

1. This a case of what may be a systematic by-pass of the safeguards in the legislation, such as the allowing of Gardai of lower ranks working in C&amp;S to access such requests.

2. The safeguard is simply being used as a &quot;rubber stamp&quot; without any consideration of reasonable grounds for the access being (akin to the defective search warrant procedure of the unconstitutionally obtained evidence case of DPP v Mark Kenny [1990] 2 IR 110)

It is clear from this, and what people have saw, and heard about the existing front line PULSE database system from serving members of An Garda Siochana that there is a very lax culture with regard to data protection in the organisation, to which even Reserve members have &quot;limited access&quot;.

It&#039;s clear that oversight is inadequate. But it&#039;s great that you take the time to bring this issues to attention, as a law student and a recreational internet user, I enjoy reading the blog. Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say that this particular case is disturbing, and I think it raises serious issues in how access to sensitive information is handled.</p>
<p>As you rightly point out, why did a Chief Superintendent sign this off? It means either of two things:</p>
<p>1. This a case of what may be a systematic by-pass of the safeguards in the legislation, such as the allowing of Gardai of lower ranks working in C&amp;S to access such requests.</p>
<p>2. The safeguard is simply being used as a &#8220;rubber stamp&#8221; without any consideration of reasonable grounds for the access being (akin to the defective search warrant procedure of the unconstitutionally obtained evidence case of DPP v Mark Kenny [1990] 2 IR 110)</p>
<p>It is clear from this, and what people have saw, and heard about the existing front line PULSE database system from serving members of An Garda Siochana that there is a very lax culture with regard to data protection in the organisation, to which even Reserve members have &#8220;limited access&#8221;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s clear that oversight is inadequate. But it&#8217;s great that you take the time to bring this issues to attention, as a law student and a recreational internet user, I enjoy reading the blog. Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The lives of others: Garda abuses power to spy on ex, ends up in special branch!</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2011/09/02/garda-who-abused-phone-records-to-spy-on-ex-will-not-be-prosecuted-will-keep-job/comment-page-1/#comment-160631</link>
		<dc:creator>The lives of others: Garda abuses power to spy on ex, ends up in special branch!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 09:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalrights.ie/?p=343#comment-160631</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
