<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.9" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Digital Rights Ireland</title>
	<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie</link>
	<description>Civil, Legal and Human Rights in a Digital Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:37:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>Why German data retention decision means Irish Bill should be scrapped</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Karlin Lillington writes in today&#8217;s Irish Times about the German decision striking down data retention law as a breach of privacy and what it means for the Data Retention Bill currently before the Oireachtas. Here&#8217;s an excerpt:
ANALYSIS: Data retention proposals about to become law here have been declared an invasion of privacy in Germany. Government [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2010/03/04/why-german-data-retention-decision-means-irish-bill-should-be-scrapped/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Press Release on German Data Retention Decision</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The civil rights organisation which brought the successful challenge to data retention before the German Constitutional Court has now issued a press release on that decision. Here&#8217;s the full text:
Press release by the German Working Group on Data Retention (AK Vorrat)
2 March 2010:
After data retention ruling: Civil liberties activists call for political end to retention [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2010/03/03/press-release-on-german-data-retention-decision/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>German Constitutional Court strikes down data retention law</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Great news from Germany, where the Federal Constitutional Court has found data retention law to be incompatible with the right to privacy under the German Constitution. More thoughts on the decision and the implications for our own case at a later stage, but for the meantime here&#8217;s the initial AP report:
MELISSA EDDY Associated Press Writer
5:23 [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2010/03/02/german-constitutional-court-strikes-down-data-retention-law/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Why Irish defamation law is still inadequate for the internet</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The Defamation Act 2009 was hugely controversial for the blasphemy offence it created. Lost in the noise, however, was the fact that it did very little to improve the position of online speech.
Before the draft Bill was published, we identified several areas which needed to be addressed to protect freedom of expression for internet users. [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2010/02/28/irish-defamation-law-still-inadequate-for-internet/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Reform of search warrants must take computer searches into account</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The Law Reform Commission has just published a consultation paper on search warrants and bench warrants. In relation to search warrants it points out there is currently a bewildering array of statutory provisions (over 100 different Acts and Regulations) which deal with searches, with different procedures to be followed and different powers of search and [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2009/12/28/reform-of-search-warrants-computers/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>English translation of Romanian data retention decision now available</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month the Romanian Constitutional Court issued an important decision holding that national data retention laws were unconstitutional and in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights. The full text of that judgment is now available in English and makes cheering reading for civil liberties advocates, with the Constitutional Court accepting the argument that [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2009/11/26/english-translation-of-romanian-data-retention-decision-now-available/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Data Retention Bill at Committee Stage</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The Data Retention Bill goes to Committee Stage before the Dáil today. The Irish Council for Civil Liberties have put together some excellent submissions on how the Bill should be amended to protect fundamental rights &#8211; a copy is here.
Séan Sherlock (Lab.) is also on top of this issue and has put forward extremely desirable [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2009/11/11/data-retention-bill-at-committee-stage/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Romanian Constitutional Court finds data retention law unconstitutional</title>
		<description><![CDATA[From an email by Bogdan Manolea:
 The Romanian Constitutional Court declared, yesterday afternoon, the data retention law (law 298/2008) as unconstitutional, as it breaches art 28 of the Romanian Constitution which provides that secrecy of the letters, telegrams and other postal communications, of telephone conversations, and of any other legal means of communication is inviolable.
So [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2009/10/09/romanian-ruling-on-data-retention/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>JC Decaux should backpedal on iPhone app threat</title>
		<description><![CDATA[[Cross-posted from IT Law in Ireland]
I&#8217;m quoted in today&#8217;s Irish Times on the threats made by JC Decaux against Fusio resulting in their taking down their Dublin Bikes App.
Leave aside for a moment the PR stupidity of this strategy.
Ignore if you will the dubious legal basis of their claim. (Without going into the finer points [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2009/09/25/jc-decaux-should-backpedal/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Data Retention &#8211; Should it be left to a private agreement between the State and Telcos?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Karlin Lillington has a strong piece in today&#8217;s Irish Times about a leaked draft agreement on data retention between state agencies (the Garda Síochána, Revenue and Defence Forces) and the telecoms industry (represented by ALTO, TIF and the ISPAI). Her comments are worth quoting extensively:
A secret memorandum of understanding between State agencies and the communications [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2009/09/25/data-retention-should-it-be-left-to-a-private-agreement-between-the-state-and-telcos/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
